1997 Nissan 240SX

1996 Nissan 240SX 2 Dr STD Coupe
Photos
Fuel economy: N/A
True Cost to Own®: Not available

Used TMV from $2,436

Appraise Your Car

What Edmunds Says

Not Available

Pros

Great-looking rear-wheel drive sports coupe.

Cons

Lacks power and front seat head room.

Read full review

Available Models

Use the Edmunds Pricing System to help you get the best deal:

Base

  • 2.4L 4-cyl. engine 
  • Manual transmission 

View All Features & Specs

Used TMV from $2,436

APPRAISE YOUR CAR submodelindex:0,make:Nissan, submodel:240SX, year:1997, trim.trimName:Base, zip:nozip

SE

  • 2.4L 4-cyl. engine 
  • Manual transmission 

View All Features & Specs

Used TMV from $2,770

APPRAISE YOUR CAR submodelindex:1,make:Nissan, submodel:240SX, year:1997, trim.trimName:SE, zip:nozip

LE

  • 2.4L 4-cyl. engine 
  • Manual transmission 

View All Features & Specs

Used TMV from $3,040

APPRAISE YOUR CAR submodelindex:2,make:Nissan, submodel:240SX, year:1997, trim.trimName:LE, zip:nozip

What's New for 1997

Extensive exterior changes update the look of the 240SX. A luxury model is introduced midyear.

Review

In 1990, the Nissan corporate think tank was in high gear, producing some of the most fun-to-drive cars of any carmaker on the planet. In quick succession, Nissan dealers received new model after new model, all of them exhibiting a brash, in-your-face personality and suave good looks. The Nissan 240SX was no exception to the rule. The car was engineered with eager young drivers in mind. To keep the insurance companies at bay, a twin-cam four cylinder was the sole powerplant available. For tail-out good times, Nissan opted for rear-wheel drive on the 240, and then designed a graceful body that could be had as a coupe or hatchback. Later, a convertible was offered. The 240SX was an instant hit, particularly in hatchback form.

In 1995, Nissan fiddled with the formula. Gone is the popular hatchback. Gone is the convertible. Gone are low prices. Gone is the brash personality. The Nissan 240SX has moved Uptown, baby. It retains rear-wheel drive and the twin-cam four. It retains speedy performance. It retains suave good looks. But in trying to become a mini Infiniti, the Nissan 240SX has lost its magical charm.

This doesn't mean it's a bad car. The Nissan 240SX should do rather well with people who find the more refined, V6-equipped Mazda MX-6 LS unsatisfactory. Inside, the 240SX displays excellent ergonomics, with rich leather seating surfaces an extra-cost frill. Load on the options, and the 240SX SE approaches $28,000.

Time for a wake-up call, Nissan. Mazda's MX-6 LS V6 performs better, costs appreciably less when fully equipped, and is prettier to look at than the 240SX SE. And for those of us paying off school loans, the new Nissan 200SX, based on the Sentra, is closer to the original 240 in execution and price than this wannabe luxo-coupe.

Research Models

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Recently Viewed

    Select your vehicles
    Hosted by uCoz