Average Consumer Rating
6
Total Reviews
Write a review
MSRP from $32,150
2011 Volvo XC70 T6 4dr Wagon AWD (3.0L 6cyl Turbo 6A)
Volvo has read my mind- all my "issues" with my 2008 standard XC70 have been completely corrected in the 2011 T6 model.
It is absolutely worth the extra $ for the turbo version.
I traded in my 2008 and a 2008 BMW M3 on this Volvo and I don't miss the BMW at all because the new Volvo is so much fun to drive.
The best of both worlds.
Way to go, Volvo!
Read the full review
2011 Volvo XC70 T6 4dr Wagon AWD (3.0L 6cyl Turbo 6A)
I had a 2005 Subaru Forrester XT with 94K miles, and decided it was time for a new vehicle .
I wanted a car that was fun to drive, yet able to carry me, my friends and camping gear up Idaho forrest roads.
I looked at 2010 Forrester and Outback, but settled on the XC 70 T6.
It is very fun to drive.
I love the comfortable seat and the relatively quiet AWD.
The handling was excellent and the turbo had loads of pickup.
I've only had it a week, but I am very happy.
Read the full review
2011 Volvo XC70 T6 4dr Wagon AWD (3.0L 6cyl Turbo 6A)
We had wanted to buy one of these for over a year, and I had done extensive research.
I initially wanted a V70, but wife wanted the AWD.
I thought the base XC70 3.2 was too slow and inefficient, and wanted to see what happened after Ford sold Volvo to the Chinese.
I'm glad I waited.
Not only were prices slashed, but quality and features improved.
I picked up an XC70 T6 cheaper than last year's base model.
Volvo hired a good CEO, and the workers in Gothenburg are happier than they were under Ford.
This combined with it being the 3rd production year should mean improved reliability, but we'll see.
I'll post a long term update after 10000 miles.
Read the full review
2011 Volvo XC70 T6 4dr Wagon AWD (3.0L 6cyl Turbo 6A)
I traded a 2009 XC70 3.2 AWD for a 2011 XC70 T6. The turbo engine significantly improves this vehicle: quieter, smoother, more than adequate acceleration and no noticeable reduction in mpg. The 3.2 is slow, buzzy/noisy and it gets lousy mpg (worst of all worlds).
You're always aware of the engine working at the limits of its capacity to move this heavy vehicle. And, while the T6's base price is $6k higher, it comes standard with AWD and premium/leather package which are nearly always added to the 3.2, so the "base" sticker price of the T6 and 3.2 are essentially the same before other options. Why not get the bigger engine?
Read the full review
2011 Volvo XC70 T6 4dr Wagon AWD (3.0L 6cyl Turbo 6A)
At 1,000 miles I am impressed with all aspects of my new XC70 T6. I am getting 21+ miles in suburban driving, the seats are very supportive and comfortable. I haul two boats and have had no problems with the ability to pull them. We use the more than ample space behind the front row seats to haul all our stuff home back from our summer place. The Bliss system works as promised but does do false readings in the rain. We have the ccomvenirnce group and climate group of add ons plus the personal communications feature and all work as promised. I find the control panel easy to use and the Bluetooth set up is easy to use.
Read the full review
2011 Volvo XC70 T6 4dr Wagon AWD (3.0L 6cyl Turbo 6A)
I can't say enough good things about this car. Its fun to drive and has the most comfortable seats I've ever been in. I wasn't in love with the idea of getting a wagon/crossover but with an expanding family it was necessary. However, once I drove the car with the T6 engine all my apprehension went away. It really makes the car fun to drive as there is power on demand at all rev ranges! I test drove the 3.2 twice and the difference in performance was significant. Also like all Volvos, the XC70 is loaded with safety, convenience, and technology. I've driven about 1000 miles so far, close to 50/50 local and highway, and I'm averaging a touch over 22 MPG on 91 Octane.
Read the full review
Research Models
Advertisement
New Car Resources
Advertisement
Advertisement
Recently Viewed